RIATAL RPECOEAS
4 ON a
ya cannes
HOUSE ROAD AUT 4004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HCG
Docket No. NR5390-14
13 Nov 14
Chairman nard far Morrect
Meth, wd tor Correceu
Ne Se ae _ ous.
Secretary of the Navy’
ee
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552
Fuel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1298 dtd 3 Oct 14
(3} Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (i) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show an approved Early Return of Dependents (ERD) order.
>. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Rugkin and Ms. McCain,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b, In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. NR5390-14
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
Orders reflect the approved address for movement of family weber Ss 18
SE, ote: Petitioner received PCS
Orders on 31 January 2014. Furthermore, Petitioner transferred on 1
April 2014 and arrived to ee 30 May
2034.
a. An approved ERD order was issued om 14 Aucust 20123.
b. Petitioner is authorized reimbursement for personally
procured airfare, not to exceed the government rate, and travel
reimbursement and expenses relating to an approved ERD to include with
dependent rate Dislocation Allowance {DLA} .
c. Petitioner is authorized Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at
the Military Housing Area (MHA) rate of EP 2200 16
August 2013 until 31 January 2014. (Petitioner is authorized Family
Separation Housing Allowance-Overseas (FSH-O) from 16 August 2014
until 14 September 2013.)
@. Petitioner must file a DD 1351-2 along with orders and copies
of airfare receipts along with a copy of this letter and any other
reimbursable expenses to the local PSD in order to be reimbursed for
travel claim.
e. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled ter.
[ yf;
Te /J. CASH
Rego Ger .
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
13 Nov 14
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8277 13
The advisory opinion points out the following evidence to support its position: in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations ({JFTR), Petitioner was paid correctly on his travel claims when he was not reimbursed for his non-U.S. certified air carrier tickets. Even though Petitioner was: told to purchase the tickets by his command, there Was a U.S. certified air carrier ticket available for travel. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for: Correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8281 13
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr, Exnicios, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. See enclosure (6). See enclosure (4).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8283 13
27 July 2013. see enclosure (3). The advisory opinion points out the following evidence to support its position: in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), Petitioner was paid correctly on her travel claim when she was not reimbursed for her non-U.S.. certified air carrier ticket. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and notwithstanding the opinion expressed in enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8279 13
The advisory opinion points out the following evidence to support its position: in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), Petitioner was paid correctly on his travel claim when he was not reimbursed for his non-U.S. certified air carrier ticket. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and notwithstanding the opinion expressed in enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. When Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8282 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reimbursement of commercial airfare EVCKSE . Even though Petitioner was told to purchase the ticket by his command, there was 4 U.S. certified air carrier ticket available for the first leg of travel. When Petitioner received TDY/TAD orders to Luzon Province, Republic of the Philippines,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8278 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reimbursement of commercial airfare ticket. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations anc policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1061 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $8, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NRi061-14 27 Jun 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reimbursement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8456 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for early return of dependents (ERD), and adjust entitlement to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 June 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8004 14
NR8004-14 23 Oct 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change Petitioner’s Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders to Active Duty for Training (ADT) orders. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04091
He was counseled by his assignment counselor that his permanent change of station (PCS) orders would be written to include the entitlements that an ERD order would have provided. In this case, the applicant was notified of his assignment to Turkey before his dependents began their travel; therefore, his dependents could travel on his PCS orders. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation...